您现在的位置是: 首页 > 教育改革 教育改革
高考的利弊英语,高考的重要性英语
tamoadmin 2024-07-03 人已围观
简介1.高考取消英语的利与弊2.高考英语改革的利与弊有哪些3.对于高考改革的看法 英语作文120字4.高考降低英语比重利弊Recalled the idea is that when the college entrance examination tension and excitement, prepared to take a test so nervous, so excited to sho
1.高考取消英语的利与弊
2.高考英语改革的利与弊有哪些
3.对于高考改革的看法 英语作文120字
4.高考降低英语比重利弊
Recalled the idea is that when the college entrance examination tension and excitement, prepared to take a test so nervous, so excited to show their efforts.
College entrance examination, is the of my life, and cultural level. I do not agree with this. Because, we will learn more knowledge in the university.
After an entrance examination to determine the fate of life. My view is that China has a graet population, the college entrance examination is a fair game. Although some students may not play the usual level in the entrance. However, after the a entrance on the students would be able to enter university, reducing examination workload of the workers, but also to reduce opportunities for cheating in the review.
I think in the next few years, the college entrance examination system is hard for a larger reform. My suggestion is that the students to study hard and strive to defeat more opponents in the
800字?不可能啊。。。。。。
高考取消英语的利与弊
In China, the fairness of the college entrance examination has been raising concern all the time. It was reported recently that a university in Xi’an, regardless of the regulations, got some college students to participate in the grading of the test papers of the college entrance examination, causing much debate throughout the country. </SPAN></SPAN></p>Only those who are qualified, such as professors in the university and experienced teachers in high schools can mark the test papers. Because they are the experts in the field, who can limit the number of the mistakes to its minimum. Any mistake in the college entrance examination might change a person’s future. In my opinion, we should do everything we can to make sure of the fairness of the college entrance examination.</SPAN></SPAN></p>
高考英语改革的利与弊有哪些
好处:1.促进英语教育本质回归。2.促进英语教学和测试研究。3.体现以生为本。
弊端:1.不利于学生掌握英语知识,阻碍国家对人才的培养。2.不利于贫困地区的教育事业发展,拉大贫富差距。3.对就业和教学工作带来不利影响。 扩展资料
具体分析:
高考英语改革具有以下好处:
1、促进英语教育本质回归 :考试政策,是英语教育的“指挥棒”,对英语教育具有导向作用。在传统的应试教育模式中,英语的沟通属性大打折扣,在很大程度上成为升学就业的“敲门砖”。应试化的英语教学背离了英语教育的初衷。因此,英语不纳入高考总分或不统一高考,将有助于英语远离应试,回归交流工具的功能,走出应试教育的“死胡同”。
2、促进英语教学和测试研究 :英语高考社会化,要求相关的教育部门和机构,在教学层面上,就课程设置、师资匹配、教学内容和教学方法等方面做出与之相适应的调整,并积极开展教学研究,探索新的教学模式。
3、体现以生为本 :一年多考,打破“一考定终身”,给考生提供更多选择权,体现对考生的人性关怀。从某种程度来讲,一年多考,有利于考生舒缓考试压力,降低高考恐惧感。最后,英语培训机构是英语高考社会化的受益者之一。考试次数的增加,培训机构的生源也会增加。而生源的增多,要求培训机构扩大师资规模,研发新的对路培训项目。这些转变,在创造利润的同时,也促进了就业。
高考英语改革具有以下弊端:
1、不利于学生掌握英语知识,阻碍国家对人才的培养:高考一年多考不利于学生掌握语言,语言的学习需要长期持续性,反复学习使用。若一个学生在高一就通过优秀等级,在高二高三暂停英语的学习,这两年学习的缺失有可能让他的英语水平退回到起点。
2、不利于贫困地区的教育事业发展,拉大贫富差距:高考英语向社会化考试方向发展或将对教育落后地区造成较大的冲击,加大“英语鸿沟”。对于教育资源较为丰富的北上广等地区,如果课内英语无法满足学生的高诉求,他们可以寻找课外途径,未来是高考还是留学他们也有很多的'选择。但对于教育资源相对贫瘠的地区的孩子而言,这样的改革会使本应免费享受基本英语教育的孩子的机会越来越小,他们与发达地区的学生英语水平的差距也越拉越大。
3、对就业和教学工作带来不利影响:此次改革对英语方面的变动太大,部分高校减少了英语教师的聘用,这对从事师范类英语专业的学生就业带来的巨大影响也是不言而喻的,毕业就面临着失业这一现象将更为严峻。而在教学过程中,教师必须逐渐适应这个变化,给教学工作又带来了一定难度。
对于高考改革的看法 英语作文120字
1、高考改革后,英语科目实行了一年两考,每个考生可以参加两次英语科目的考试,最后取最好的一次成绩计入高考分数。
2、英语科目考两次可以降低考生在高考时的压力,如果头一次英语科目考试的成绩比较理想,高考前就可以把全部精力用在复习语文和数学两个科目上了。
高考降低英语比重利弊
It is reported that the listening test will have been canceled in the English College Entrance Examination of Shandong province since 2014. The news triggers a heated discussion among the people who are concerned about the most important examination. Some people hold that the burden of the students will be reduced without listening. Also, it tends to avoid such public affairs as happened among the examinees and help to reduce the city and countryside disparity. There are other people, however, who are against this decision on this reform. They argue that this policy may influence negatively the English teaching method of senor or junior middle schools and even primary schools all over the country, for it is most likely to result in rebirth of “Deaf English” or “Dumb English”.
In my opinion, college entrance examinationis supposed to examine all aspects of English learning including listening,speaking, reading and writing. It is hardly possible for an examination without listing to assess students’ overall language ability. As to reducing students’burden, what matters is how to reform the way to test students’ ability in College Entrance Examination instead of simply canceling the listening section. For example,a student can have several chances to do listening test for College Entrance Examination.
高考降低英语比重的利弊,详细介绍如下:
一、高考降低英语比重的有利:
1、改革前的高考英语准备起来和语文、数学等处于同等地位,绝大部分中国的高中毕业生将来如果不出国的话,英语是用不到的。所以英语在整个考试中占的比重应该减少。
2、改革的英语课程其实需要做的是从实用出发,笔者在多年留学规划的实践过程中,接触的学生很多。
二、高考降低英语比重的弊端:
1、英语是国际生活中的通用语言,在国际交流交往中普及率比较高。中国正在崛起,和世界上其他国家和地区的交往会越来越多,英语学习对从事相关工作的人事关重大。中国虽然人很多,但有国际视野的人才还是稀缺的,英语作为传递信息和思想的工具,还是非常重要的。
2、取消或减轻英语后,受影响最大的应该是国内二三线城市的的孩子。这些学生所能分配到的教育资源相对较少。平时英语的培训会随着高考指挥棒的指引减少,再加上小城市英语师资力量本来就薄弱,农村学生的英语水平和大城市的距离会加大,这些学生将来出国的机会会减小。
3、正规的国际班由于始终会把英语的学习放在重要地位,所以国际班学生的英语水平在申请美国名校时占有一定优势。